|
|

10-29-2010, 06:38 AM
|
|
Jets Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Palm Coast, Fl.
Posts: 23,266
|
|
|
Impressive prediction record from thejetsblog.
Week Seven Prediction
By Andrew Weiss
Oct 28, 2010
This week’s a squeaker!
The points are starting to level off and prediction is getting better. We predicted 44 points and the Broncos and Jets scored 44 points. We’ll have to wait another week or two to see if this holds steady and the system can be relied on for over/unders now that there’s seven weeks of data. Just barely beat the spread last game. We predicted a five point spread and it was actually four.
Here’s what the numbers say for Sunday at 1 vs the Packers. The Jets have exceeded opponents defenses on average by 4%. Based on Packer opponent numbers and pts. allowed, then, we can predict that the Jets will score 23 points this week. As for the Packers, they’ve overperformed their opponents defenses by 21%. Based on Jets’ opponents numbers and pts. allowed, then, we’ve got the Packers scoring 19 points. A squeaker. The final: 23-19 Jets. Sorry to say, the Jets are not predicted to cover the six. Take the Packers to cover, but lose a close one.
Remember these are based on weightings of average performance of opponents which ought to improve as the year goes on.
Last game’s prediction: Jets 25/Broncos 19. Actual score: Jets 24/Broncos 20, with a little late help from a late flag. Since the Jets covered the +3.5, the prediction is upheld. Season record against the spread: 4-0.
|

10-29-2010, 11:55 AM
|
 |
Owner's Box
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UWS - NYC
Posts: 2,325
|
|
|
I'm particularly impressed with their ability to ignore everything but a simple stat in determining the final score. Focussing on the Jets, for example, one might want to consider factors, in both directions, such as (1) Sanchez having performed relatively poorly his last two (or at least 1.5) game, (2) supposed return to full strength of the best CB in the league, (3) better integration of Santonio Homes into the offense, (4) further recuperation of Calvin Pace, etc. Curious that none of that figures in.
|

10-29-2010, 12:21 PM
|
|
Head Coach Material
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 9,772
|
|
|
Yeah, Its a power point prediction, but football is a matchup sport
|

10-29-2010, 12:25 PM
|
 |
Celebrating in the 1st Deck
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 1,399
|
|
|
You're right in that its a single stat
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoink
I'm particularly impressed with their ability to ignore everything but a simple stat in determining the final score. Focussing on the Jets, for example, one might want to consider factors, in both directions, such as (1) Sanchez having performed relatively poorly his last two (or at least 1.5) game, (2) supposed return to full strength of the best CB in the league, (3) better integration of Santonio Homes into the offense, (4) further recuperation of Calvin Pace, etc. Curious that none of that figures in.
|
but its not a simple one. Its more a trend as baseline kinda thingy  but I'll take 23 19 wins any day.
__________________
"Never confuse a clear view with a short distance"
|

10-30-2010, 06:35 AM
|
 |
Owner's Box
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UWS - NYC
Posts: 2,325
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestSideJohnny
but its not a simple one. Its more a trend as baseline kinda thingy  but I'll take 23 19 wins any day.
|
I was hoping for a blow-out, but I'll sign up now for any win (and no injuries).
|

10-30-2010, 07:51 AM
|
 |
Head Coach Material
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Lee, NJ USA
Posts: 8,293
|
|
|
hey, look at the sf giants. win close all reg season, then roll out the blow-out in the big show. they call it "torture."
__________________
"I try to talk with my pads," David Harris
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
|