PDA

View Full Version : The Wright Albatross for Obama


Scorpion42
05-02-2008, 02:08 AM
The Wright Albatross for Obama
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
By: Ronald Kessler




Now that Barack Obama has at last denounced the Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s outrageous statements, questions about his relationship with his mentor and sounding board for two decades will be between him and the American people, Steve Schmidt, a top adviser to John McCain, tells Newsmax.

“This is not an issue that the McCain campaign is going to run ads on,” Schmidt says. “Senator McCain’s not going to give speeches about it. But Reverend Wright has clearly said a lot of outrageous things that are offensive to tens of millions of Americans.”

At this point, “It’s not about the McCain campaign, it’s about Senator Obama,” Schmidt says. “The American people will make assessments about the candidates, their background, their character, their judgment. They put a lot of information into that mix. And there is no question that this is a very big story that has been covered quite extensively. And it will be up to Senator Obama to address questions that Americans have about this relationship.”

Reacting to Wright’s speech at the National Press Club, Obama yesterday accused the man he consulted before announcing his run for the presidency of exploiting racism and “giving comfort to those who prey on hate.”

Those who read The New York Times for coverage of Wright’s speech would have had no idea what Obama was belatedly outraged about. While the paper ran a Page One story about the speech, it was a commentary that focused on how self-centered Wright came across. The story avoided mentioning any of the offensive remarks, including Wright’s words of praise for Louis Farrakhan and his claim that America introduced the AIDS virus to kill off blacks and that 9/11 was payback for America's terrorist acts.

It was another example of media favoritism toward Obama, illustrated by the press’ refusal to pick up Newsmax stories about Wright and Obama for 2 1/2 months until mid-March, as outlined in the Newsmax story "The Media’s Blackout on Rev. Wright."

Contrary to Wright’s claim at the press club that Farrakhan’s last anti-Semitic statement came 20 years ago, on Nov. 11, 2007, Farrakhan said in a speech, “Do you know some of these satanic Jews have taken over BET [the Black Entertainment Network]?” Farrakhan continued, “Everything that we built, they have. The mind of Satan now is running the record industry, movie industry, and television. And they make us look like we’re the murderers; we look like we’re the gangsters, but we’re punk stuff.”

The following month, Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ gave Farrakhan an award for lifetime achievement, saying he “epitomized greatness.”

After Newsmax broke that story, Obama claimed the award was for Farrakhan’s work with ex-offenders, even though the presentation and article about it in the church magazine said nothing about ex-offenders.

In contrast to its suppression of what Wright said at the press club, the Times ran a 1,397-word story over the weekend insinuating that there was something improper in the fact that the beer distributorship owned by McCain’s wife Cindy has provided his campaign with a jet plane at low cost. The story never answered the question, So what?

Asked about the irony of running that story and not Wright’s offensive remarks, Schmidt responded, “The plane story was another baseless controversy manufactured by the Times, continuing their campaign against McCain.”

If the press is playing favorites, the fight between Obama and Hillary Clinton plays into McCain’s hands.

“We feel very good about where we are in this race,” Schmidt says. “The majority of polls show Senator McCain in hypothetical match-ups against both Democrats to be in roughly an even race. We have a united Republican Party behind Senator McCain, and we feel very good about the chances. We’ve seen great support from Governor [Mitt] Romney, Governor [Mike] Huckabee, Mayor [Rudy] Giuliani, Senator [Fred] Thompson. And if you look at the division that’s taking place in the Democratic Party right now, we’re sitting pretty in the Republican Party, with all of its elements unified.”

In the coming weeks, “You’ll see Senator McCain talking about the biggest issues the country faces, which is winning this war against radical Islamic extremism and protecting the national security of the country,” Schmidt says. “He’ll point out the huge differences between his desire to win this war and the Democratic plans to withdraw troops, creating a situation where we de facto surrender, where al-Qaida claims victory, where there will be chaos and genocide in the region, and where likely we will have to send American troops back to fight a bigger, more costly, bloodier war.”

McCain will also focus on Obama’s and Clinton’s weak positions on protecting the country by conducting timely surveillance of foreign terrorists to uncover clues to plots. In effect, their votes against the Protect America Act would have given Osama bin Laden and other terrorists the same rights as Americans when it comes to intercepting their communications.

“Surveillance of the terrorist enemy is important, and their position on it is frankly ridiculous, and it’s something we’ll point out very aggressively to the American people.,” Schmidt says.

McCain will be talking about his proposal to reform healthcare, a plan that will “make it less costly and more available to American families without the big government intrusion,” he says.

“McCain says if you like the airport lines going through security, you’ll love government-run healthcare,” Schmidt says. “And the fact is that both Senator Obama and Senator Clinton are calling for major government intrusion into the healthcare markets, and it hasn’t worked in other countries where that’s been tried.”

McCain will be talking about giving a boost to the economy and cutting government spending.

“Senator McCain has been very critical of the current administration in terms of the out-of-control federal spending,” his adviser notes. “He means it when he says he’ll veto every one of these pork-laden bills that come before his desk as president. He’s sick of borrowing money from China to pay for wasteful products. Senator Clinton has asked for $2.3 billion in pork-barrel earmark projects. It’s outrageous, and Senator McCain is going to do something about it.”

McCain is “a man who loves his country deeply, who is focused on running a decent and honorable campaign addressing the big issues,” Schmidt says. “He’s somebody who likes to get a lot of viewpoints, likes to create an environment of debate and discussions where no idea is off the table.”

Then, Schmidt says, “He makes the decision, and that decision is grounded in a philosophy that people ought to have more control, the government ought to have less control; that taxes are too high, not too low; that government spends too much, not too little; and that we have to fight and win this fight against radical Islamic extremism.”

Scorpion42
05-02-2008, 02:15 AM
The Media’s Blackout on Rev. Wright
Thursday, March 20, 2008 3:20 PM
By: Ronald Kessler


For more than a year, the media ignored Barack Obama’s close association with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Now media critics are asking why.

The answer is that reporters and editors are enamored of Obama and do not want to touch such a racially charged subject.

As chief Washington correspondent of Newsmax, I began doing stories about Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ and its so-called Black Value System on Jan. 7 with “Barack Obama’s Racist Church.”

The story said the Black Value System asserts that America structures “an economic environment that induces captive youth to fill the jails and prisons” and takes other steps to “snare” blacks rather than “killing them off directly” or “placing them in concentration camps.”

I cited two exceptions to the media blackout about Obama and his church. Tucker Carlson of MSNBC had described Trinity as having a “racially exclusive theology” that “contradicts the basic tenets of Christianity.” Sean Hannity of Fox News had confronted Wright on TV and asked how a Black Value System would be any more acceptable than a white value system.

On Jan. 14, I broke the story on the church’s lifetime achievement award last December to Louis Farrakhan with “Obama Minister Honored Farrakhan.” The story on Newsmax.com quoted Wright’s glowing praise of Farrakhan in the church magazine, Trumpet.

The next day, Richard Cohen wrote a Washington Post column on the award.

“Maybe for Wright and some others, Farrakhan ‘epitomized greatness,’” Cohen wrote. “For most Americans, though, Farrakhan epitomizes racism, particularly in the form of anti-Semitism.”

In subsequent weeks, I wrote more stories, including one pointing out that Obama was dissembling about the reason for the award. Obama said that the award was for Farrakhan’s work with ex-offenders. In fact, the award presentation said nothing about ex-offenders.

On March 6, I wrote “Obama Minister Exudes Hatred.” That story quoted the full text of a sermon Wright gave at Howard University on Feb. 15, 2006. Based on that, I sent a proposed Op-Ed to the Washington Post’s editorial side. I sent a similar piece to the paper’s "Outlook" section. Both rejected the piece.

On March 12, Fox News ran a portion of a Wright sermon. ABC ran more excerpts the next day. On March 15, my Op-Ed, “Obama and the Minister,”appeared in The Wall Street Journal. Based on reporting for Newsmax, it included excerpts from the Howard University sermon. The Op-Ed had been submitted the previous week.

Referring to that piece, the March 15 New York Times said, “On Friday, Senator John McCain’s campaign forwarded to reporters an article in The Wall Street Journal in which Mr. Wright was quoted as saying, ‘Racism is how this country was founded and how this country is still run,’ and accusing the United States of importing drugs, exporting guns and training murderers.”

That same day, the Washington Post reported in a Page One story that “more examples of Wright’s rhetoric surfaced this week, including a speech Wright delivered in 2006 at Howard University in which he said: ‘Racism is how this country was founded and how this country was run . . . We believe in white supremacy and black inferiority and believe it more than we believe in God.’ The speech was quoted in an Op-Ed article in Friday’s Wall Street Journal.”

Beginning with the first story on Jan. 7, I sent my Newsmax stories and later The Wall Street Journal Op-Ed to key reporters, editors, and television producers at major news organizations.

Addressing Obama’s belated public criticism of Wright’s comments, Richard Cohen wrote in his March 16 Washington Post column, “How is it possible that a campaign apparatus that sniffed out Geraldine Ferraro’s offensive statement to a local California newspaper (the Daily Breeze, 12th paragraph) did not know that Wright’s statements condemning America were all over the internet and had been cited March 6 by the (reputable) anti-Obama columnist Ronald Kessler?”

As a former Wall Street Journal and Washington Post reporter myself, I have many contacts in the media. When I first began doing the stories, a reporter for one of the networks told me she could never propose such a story.

“The media love Obama,” she said. “If you want to do a critical story about him, you are considered by the network to be biased.”

Other contacts pointed out how the racial aspect of the story contributed to fear of touching it. In fact, I received many e-mails accusing me of being a racist. Despite the sensitivity, Chris Ruddy, CEO and editor in chief of Newsmax, never flinched.

According to pollsters, largely as a result of the recent stories about Wright, Obama’s double-digit lead over Hillary Clinton in national polls has now vanished. At the same time, John McCain has shot up in the polls.

Still, the media are hesitant to run critical stories about Obama. To date, no newspaper has pointed out that on April 11, 2007, Obama called for the firing of Don Imus over his racially offensive comment. Yet, in an exquisite example of a double standard, Obama spent two decades listening to Wright’s trademark denunciations of whites as racists and never walked out or called for his dismissal.

Instead, Obama looked to Wright as an adviser, sounding board, and friend. In a video on YouTube, Obama calls Wright a “great leader.” To this day, while Obama has distanced himself from Wright’s known paranoid and hate-filled statements about whites and America, he refuses to denounce Wright himself.

Now that the truth is out, the idea that Obama could ever be elected president is a joke. What is not a joke is the media’s refusal for more than a year to tell the truth about him.